Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 105,919 of 106,651    |
|    Sylvia Else to David Spain    |
|    Re: SLS launch. NASA still has it    |
|    21 Nov 22 13:09:20    |
      From: sylvia@email.invalid              On 17/11/2022 11:49 pm, David Spain wrote:              > I'm happy SLS got off the ground. I'd be even more happy if it were       > reconfigured to deliver cargo only and we could use up the supply of       > this expensive, ill-conceived rocket to put one and done cargo into       > space. Perhaps in either lunar or Lagrange Point orbits.       >       > Not a big fan of the gateway/toll-booth either....       >       > Dave       >              I seem to remember the USAF [*] doing a study that showed that a solid       rocket failure after lift-off could be unsurvivable because bits of       burning solid rocket fuel would destroy the capsule's parachutes. I       don't believe a solution was found.              So relegating it to cargo only would certainly make sense, if there       really is no cheaper alternative available.              Sylvia.              [*] Yes - I don't know why the USAF was doing that either.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca