From: doc@tardis.org   
      
   On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 09:43:02 +1100, Sylvia Else    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 26-Dec-22 8:43 pm, Doctor Who wrote:   
   >> On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 09:19:52 +1100, Sylvia Else    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 24-Dec-22 3:48 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> We are so sure that we are NOT wrong that we PAY anyone who proves us   
   wrong, that is, WE ARE WRONG!   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>> Let's be clear about the meaning of that sentence. I'll edit it slightly:   
   >>>   
   >>> "We are so sure that we are NOT wrong that we PAY anyone who proves *TO   
   >>> US* THAT WE ARE WRONG!"   
   >>>   
   >>> Needless to say, that will be impossible.   
   >>>   
   >>> Sylvia.   
   >>   
   >> even after the patent publication yo ustill trolling us.   
   >>   
   >> you are a troll.   
   >   
   >A patent doesn't prove that it works. At most your patent proves that   
   >either the patent jurisdiction does not prohibit patents that violate   
   >the presently understood laws of physics, without a working example, or   
   >that the patent examiner failed to realise that that's what the patent does.   
   >   
   >Sylvia.   
      
   washing the donkey's head wastes time with soap and water.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)