From: doc@tardis.org   
      
   On Tue, 03 Jan 2023 09:18:26 +0200, om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:   
      
   >Doctor Who  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 14:16:33 +0200, om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:   
   >>> Doctor Who  wrote:   
   >>>> Sylvia Else  wrote:   
   >>>>> On 30-Dec-22 8:47 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:   
   >>>>>> We have an operative PNN thruster   
   >>>>> No you don't. You're either deluded or lying.   
   >>>> prove it.   
   >>> Sorry, it's the one who makes the claims that has to prove them,   
   >>> not everyone else to disapprove them.   
   >>   
   >> she made the claim that we haven't a working prototype, prove it.   
   >   
   >She disputed your claim that you have an operative device — what you   
   >have is a prototype which shows some promise in laboratory conditions.   
   >   
   >As I said earlier, this is the step where NASA reviewed the Robert   
   >Shawyer EmDrive, and for a moment even thought it worked. Unfortunately   
   >it was afterwards pretty conclusively shown that the "thrust" produced   
   >was a thermal effect, as the suspicion is also in this case.   
      
   bla bla bla   
      
   you know where you can put your "suspicions".   
      
   washing the donkey's head is a waste of time, water and soap!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)