INTL 1:1/130 1:229/2   
   REPLYADDR doc@tardis.org   
   REPLYTO 1:229/2.0 UUCP   
   MSGID:  0e40c96a   
   REPLY:  cccd0067   
   PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
   From: Doctor Who    
   Newsgroups: sci.space.policy   
   Subject: Re: So you think it is a thermal effect ...   
   Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 14:37:25 +0100   
   Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server   
   Message-ID:    
   Mime-Version: 1.0   
   Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii   
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit   
   Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="58803"; posting-host="   
     uHys0xt8pc2csU1PlhqMfw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.   
     org";   
   User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272   
   X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2   
   X-Received-Bytes: 1723   
   From: doc@tardis.org   
      
   On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 03:16:53 -0800, Snidely    
   wrote:   
      
   >Doctor Who  scribbled something on Thursday the 1/12/2023:   
   >> We ask you to prove that you know electrodynamics.   
   >   
   >An electric or magnetic field generates a force on a charged particle.   
   >But charged particles still have mass, and their acceleration is still   
   >constrained by that mass.  Which has been well studied at highly   
   >relativistic speeds (and the magnets at CERN are very big and use a lot   
   >power to move a smattering of particles).  Each upgrade since the   
   >original cyclotron has required more power for smaller increases in   
   >speed.   
   >   
   >Is there something else in electrodynamics that you think allows   
   >acceleration where F=ma doesn't apply, in either its Newtonian or   
   >relativistic form?   
   >   
   >/dps   
      
      
   washing donkey's head is a waste of time with soap and water.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
   SEEN-BY: 123/126 229/2 400 426 700 900/102   
   PATH: 229/2 426