INTL 1:1/130 1:229/2
REPLYADDR snidely.too@gmail.com
REPLYTO 1:229/2.0 UUCP
MSGID: cccd0067
REPLY: <8vk0shhdc46c4pgjdkt3irp9pud5u08j87@4ax.com> b44db166
PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
From: Snidely
Newsgroups: sci.space.policy
Subject: Re: So you think it is a thermal effect ...
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 03:16:53 -0800
Organization: Dis One
Lines: 22
Message-ID:
Reply-To: snidely.too@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="
d05ac13fe97cf5a64cbc8b5d02ac4c45"; logging-data="1690297"; mail-complaints-
to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="
U2FsdGVkX19P2iYFslM16ZV4fM2hppnIw5vVeAvwleI="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ni6hpE98L/px7gxKTwBCCrkkcKg=
X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb
X-ICQ: 543516788
X-Received-Bytes: 1797
From: snidely.too@gmail.com
Doctor Who scribbled something on Thursday the 1/12/2023:
> We ask you to prove that you know electrodynamics.
An electric or magnetic field generates a force on a charged particle.
But charged particles still have mass, and their acceleration is still
constrained by that mass. Which has been well studied at highly
relativistic speeds (and the magnets at CERN are very big and use a lot
power to move a smattering of particles). Each upgrade since the
original cyclotron has required more power for smaller increases in
speed.
Is there something else in electrodynamics that you think allows
acceleration where F=ma doesn't apply, in either its Newtonian or
relativistic form?
/dps
--
You could try being nicer and politer
> instead, and see how that works out.
-- Katy Jennison
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
SEEN-BY: 123/126 229/2 400 426 700 900/102
PATH: 229/2 426
|
