home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.space.policy      Discussions about space policy      106,651 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 106,061 of 106,651   
   Dean Markley to Snidely   
   Re: Sylvia, you're a donkey   
   22 Feb 23 04:21:38   
   
   From: damarkley@gmail.com   
      
   On Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 1:07:30 PM UTC-5, Snidely wrote:   
   > On Tuesday or thereabouts, Dean Markley declared ...   
   > > On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:   
   > >> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley   
   > >>  wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>> On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:   
   > >>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley   
   > >>>>  wrote:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:   
   > >>>>>> On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> You eat dry forage.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> and lallo   
   > >>>>>> I like donkeys. They're cute.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Sylvia.   
   > >>>>> You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand....   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why   
   are   
   > >>>>> you trolling so hard?   
   > >>>> I am the Doctor.   
   > >>> Answer my question.   
   > >> you don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are   
   > >> donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more.   
   > >   
   > > No because if you were serious, you certainly wouldn't be arguing in a   
   Google   
   > > Group.   
   > Well, technically, it's not a Google Group, it's a usenet newsgroup,   
   > and it exists on servers outside of Google, and is just mirrored by   
   > Google.   
   >   
   > On the other hand, there's no one here representing either investors   
   > nor people whose validation of the equipment would carry any weight in   
   > the real world.   
   >   
   > /dps   
   >   
   > --   
   > There's nothing inherently wrong with Big Data. What matters, as it   
   > does for Arnold Lund in California or Richard Rothman in Baltimore, are   
   > the questions -- old and new, good and bad -- this newest tool lets us   
   > ask. (R. Lerhman, CSMonitor.com)   
      
   Yes, thank you for the correction.  But you amplified my point which I also   
   appreciate.  Why is this guy trying so hard in here?  It's really not the   
   place to try if you are serious.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca