From: sylvia@email.invalid   
      
   On 22-Feb-23 11:21 pm, Dean Markley wrote:   
   > On Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 1:07:30 PM UTC-5, Snidely wrote:   
   >> On Tuesday or thereabouts, Dean Markley declared ...   
   >>> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:   
   >>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:45:32 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley   
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 9:46:44 AM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 04:34:54 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley   
   >>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:21:01 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 17-Feb-23 12:20 am, Doctor Who wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> You eat dry forage.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> and lallo   
   >>>>>>>> I like donkeys. They're cute.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Sylvia.   
   >>>>>>> You are correct Sylvia, donkeys are cute. Asses on the other hand....   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> So, Mr. Who (I'm not going to call you Dr. for obvious reasons), why   
   are   
   >>>>>>> you trolling so hard?   
   >>>>>> I am the Doctor.   
   >>>>> Answer my question.   
   >>>> you don't take us seriously from the start, that's why you are   
   >>>> donkeys, you just live with standard physics, you don't know more.   
   >>>   
   >>> No because if you were serious, you certainly wouldn't be arguing in a   
   Google   
   >>> Group.   
   >> Well, technically, it's not a Google Group, it's a usenet newsgroup,   
   >> and it exists on servers outside of Google, and is just mirrored by   
   >> Google.   
   >>   
   >> On the other hand, there's no one here representing either investors   
   >> nor people whose validation of the equipment would carry any weight in   
   >> the real world.   
   >>   
   >> /dps   
   >>   
   >> --   
   >> There's nothing inherently wrong with Big Data. What matters, as it   
   >> does for Arnold Lund in California or Richard Rothman in Baltimore, are   
   >> the questions -- old and new, good and bad -- this newest tool lets us   
   >> ask. (R. Lerhman, CSMonitor.com)   
   >   
   > Yes, thank you for the correction.  But you amplified my point which I also   
   appreciate.  Why is this guy trying so hard in here?  It's really not the   
   place to try if you are serious.   
      
   The guy did get some traction (as distinct from thrust) at one point,   
   with NASA investigating (why they would spend money on that in the   
   absence of clear evidence that it works, I do not know).   
      
   Perhaps completely unmoderated groups are now the only slightly relevant   
   places he can post to about it.   
      
   Sylvia.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)