Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 106,299 of 106,651    |
|    Sylvia Else to Alain Fournier    |
|    Re: The only hing of the Starship...    |
|    22 Nov 23 13:22:55    |
      From: sylvia@email.invalid              On 22-Nov-23 11:14 am, Alain Fournier wrote:       > On 2023-11-21 4:55 p.m., Sylvia Else wrote:       >> On 21-Nov-23 11:36 pm, Doctor Who wrote:       >>> that always work well is the autodestruction system :-)       >>>       >>> and lallo       >>       >> The launch pad was undamaged.       >>       >> Hot staging worked OK.       >       > I'm not sure about that. Both the booster and the second stage failed       > shortly after staging. The second stage had been tested and seemed to       > work well when used without staging. It is quite possible that the hot       > staging caused the future failures. Of course, this is only speculation.       > During flight, the staging did seem to go well.       >       >       > Alain Fournier       >              Scott Manley pointed out that the booster engines restarted after the       staging, but then progressively failed.              Starship flew on fine until its fuel was nearly exhausted, when the       oxygen flow increased, while the methane flow didn't.              Sylvia.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca