Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 106,302 of 106,651    |
|    Peter Stickney to Alain Fournier    |
|    Re: The only hing of the Starship...    |
|    22 Nov 23 08:29:52    |
      From: p_stickney@verizon.net              On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 19:14:11 -0500, Alain Fournier wrote:              > On 2023-11-21 4:55 p.m., Sylvia Else wrote:       >> On 21-Nov-23 11:36 pm, Doctor Who wrote:       >>> that always work well is the autodestruction system :-)       >>>       >>> and lallo       >>       >> The launch pad was undamaged.       >>       >> Hot staging worked OK.       >       > I'm not sure about that. Both the booster and the second stage failed       > shortly after staging. The second stage had been tested and seemed to       > work well when used without staging. It is quite possible that the hot       > staging caused the future failures. Of course, this is only speculation.       > During flight, the staging did seem to go well.              Hot staging is hardly new - it's been a feature of every Titan since the       1950s. Of course, with the Titan, they weren't looking to fly the booster       back.       If you're looking for a way to ensure that the propellants in the upper       stage are properly settled, and you need it simple, it's a fair solution.                     --       Peter Stickney       Java Man knew nothing about coffee              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca