Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 106,366 of 106,651    |
|    Alain Fournier to Niklas Holsti    |
|    Re: Starship IFT-3    |
|    14 Mar 24 14:49:20    |
      From: alain245@videotron.ca              On 2024-03-14 1:59 p.m., Niklas Holsti wrote:       > On 2024-03-14 18:52, Alain Fournier wrote:       >> On 2024-03-14 10:53 a.m., The Running Man wrote:       >>       >>> NASA won't be too happy with this since it will make a 2025 Lunar       >>> landing all but impossible. Even 2026 is dubious.       >>       >> I wouldn't say that. Reusing the stages isn't required to reach the       >> moon. That only allows SpaceX to make big profits. It seems to me       >> that the booster showed today that it can put the ship were it needs       >> to be to reach orbit. The ship did not reach orbit simply because it       >> wasn't trying to reach orbit. The ship didn't succeed in its reentry,       >> but there is no reentry involved in the moon mission.       >       >       > If the tanker ships, for refuelling the Lunar Starship in Earth orbit,       > can't reenter and be reused, it will be /quite/ expensive, right?       >       > There have been various statements about the number of tanker launches       > needed for one lunar mission, but there seems to be agreement that the       > number is about 10 or more.              Yes it would be quite expensive. But I think they will view that as       development cost until the do achieve intact return.                     Alain Fournier              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca