Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 106,372 of 106,651    |
|    Niklas Holsti to Alain Fournier    |
|    Re: Starship IFT-3    |
|    17 Mar 24 09:46:21    |
      From: niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid              On 2024-03-15 1:36, Alain Fournier wrote:              > Actually, I think I prefer attitude control problems. If the destruction       > of the ship was due to insufficient thermal protection or something like       > that, it could signal a hard to solve problem. But I think that we will       > all agree that SpaceX will be able to solve attitude control. Not that       > it is necessarily very easy to solve, just that they did it for their       > Falcon rocket, so there is no reason to believe they can't do it for       > Starship.                     There is an eX-Twitter video with a 3D reconstruction of the ship's       attitude (rather, attitudes) during the re-entry. This link was       originally posted on the Amateur Rocketry mailing list:              https://twitter.com/pockn_cg/status/1769057806022492396              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca