Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.policy    |    Discussions about space policy    |    106,651 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 106,381 of 106,651    |
|    Alain Fournier to The Running Man    |
|    Re: Starship IFT-4    |
|    07 Apr 24 13:54:57    |
      From: alain245@videotron.ca              On 2024-04-07 1:35 p.m., The Running Man wrote:              > To me the catching of the Super Heavy could be a do or die proposition. If       it fails SpaceX could be forced to rebuild the launch tower. And that could       take months.       >       > I didn't know he'd suggested doing this after the first successful       suborbital flight. Seems risky to me.       >              Yes it is risky. That's why SpaceX will wait until after they have hit       the ocean in a precise and controlled manner before risking a launch tower.              SpaceX plans on having several launch towers. Two in Boca Chica Texas,       two at Cape Canaveral, and later some on sea platforms. I suspect this       is because they want to be ready when an accident will happen.                     Alain Fournier              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca