From: running_man@writeable.com   
      
   On 07/03/2025 01:35 Alain Fournier  wrote:   
   > On 2025-03-06 7:16 p.m., Snidely wrote:   
   >> on 3/4/2025, The Running Man supposed :   
   >>> On 04/03/2025 03:44 Snidely  wrote:   
   >>>> SapceX decided things weren't quite right, and after using a bit of   
   >>>> hold time to thump on things (figuratively speaking), kept Flight 8   
   >>>> unflown.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Elon expects a destack.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> This dress rehearsal was going to be the quickest yet launch after   
   >>>> stacking.  The extra since Wednesday^W Friday was spent finishing   
   >>>> some of the deharmonizing work on the ship's tail end, it seems,   
   >>>> following the long static fire of S34 and the the update on Flight   
   >>>> 7's RUD.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> It's obvious SpaceX can't afford another RUD of Starship. The development   
   >>> is costing much more time than they initially expected and NASA is   
   >>> continually breathing down their necks to make Artemis 3 a reality.   
   >>   
   >> Well, they caught a booster, but they lost the ship, with some of it   
   >> visible from the Palm Beach area.   
   >>   
   >> /dps   
   >   
   >   
   > Not very different from the previous flight.   
   >   
      
   No progress made. Modification didn't work as planned.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)