From: nhull@access4less.net   
      
   In article <1135094998.297701.231310@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,   
    "Seth"  wrote:   
      
   > I was just wondering about this.  I remember checking the daily updates   
   > with my office mates about the two rovers on Mars.  We were really   
   > disappointed by the amount or quailty of information that was coming   
   > out of NASA from the rovers.  We heard all about minerals that might   
   > have been formed in a water solution way back when and this chemical   
   > compound and that.  With all of the scientific equipment on the rovers   
   > has NASA said we have found a h20 molecule.  It seems that hydrogen is   
   > going to be very important for moon and mars exploration and i would   
   > think that we would want hard evidence before we send a colony or   
   > longer mission.   
   >   
   > Thoughts??   
   >   
      
   Water is less important than money; if you do the calculations a manned   
   Mars mission is way more costly than the US can afford.  It's all talk,   
   sending a small team to mars and getting them back alive would bust the   
   treasury.   
      
   --   
   Free men own guns, slaves don't   
   www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/5357/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)