Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.science    |    Space and planetary science and related    |    1,217 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 127 of 1,217    |
|    fred.gunther@csc.com to Zbob    |
|    Re: Hubble image colorization    |
|    18 Sep 03 11:35:26    |
      Zbob:              I do NOT work with Hubble images, but rather with images taken of the       surface of the Earth by Earth-orbiting satellites. However, I have       kicked around a lot of digital images, enhancing them so that the subtle       information within the digital data can be made obvious. This is what       is done in "remote sensing."              >From my experience, I assume that Hubble images are "enhanced" for the       following reasons:              --1-- in each spectral band, the number of grey levels used by the data       are too few to show details to the rather insensitive human eye. Thus       the data are "stretched" over a larger range of data numbers, e.g., from       an original 35-42 to a resulting 0-128.              --2-- A series of "grey-level" images, each from a "band" in the em       spectrum, are not very informative. Since we humans see color, contrast       enhanced grey-scale data can be projected onto a color monitor (or color       film) with:              --2a-- a different color assignment for each data number. The resulting       color image is a "pseudocolor" image.              --2b-- a different color filter for each selected band. If the red band       is projected through a red filter, green through green, and blue through       blue, then the result is a "natural color" image. If an infrared band       (light which we can not see) is projected through a red filter, red       through a green filter and green through a blue filter, then the result       is a "false color" image.              Different astronomy sensors can look at very different parts of the em       spectrum. Sensors can record such items as the distribution of iron       atoms, hydrogen ions, stellar surface temperatures, etc. Thus, the data       can be shown only when contrast enhanced and colorized. Computers do       not need this, but people do.                     Fred              Zbob wrote:              > I saw a story on the news that there is a "Watergate of space science       > going on" in that graphics artists are colorizing the images from       > Hubble to make them more pleasing to the public. Can anyone confirm       > that story? I would think with spectral data, the colors would be       > known and no need to make them up.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca