Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.science    |    Space and planetary science and related    |    1,217 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 301 of 1,217    |
|    Jorge R. Frank to Pat Flannery    |
|    Re: The Hubble Space Telescope...    |
|    05 Dec 03 01:58:53    |
   
   XPost: sci.space.history, sci.space.shuttle   
   From: jrfrank@ibm-pc.borg.retro.com   
      
   Pat Flannery wrote in   
   news:vsjj6ka44jjd41@corp.supernews.com:   
      
   >   
   >   
   > A Hubble Hubble wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >> Current plan is to launch the prop module on an ELV when HST is no   
   >> longer able to produce science.   
   >   
   > We should talk to the Russians; a modified Progress could do this job at   
   > fairly low cost.   
      
   Not really. Progress requires a passive docking adapter and passive Kurs   
   navaids on the target vehicle. HST has no docking adapter and no navaids.   
   And as Hubble Hugger pointed out, Progress' terminal approach rate is too   
   fast for a delicate target like HST.   
      
      
   --   
   JRF   
      
   Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,   
   check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and   
   think one step ahead of IBM.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca