Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.science    |    Space and planetary science and related    |    1,217 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44 of 1,217    |
|    Joann Evans to John Schoenfeld    |
|    Re: Rockets    |
|    17 Jul 03 00:18:40    |
      XPost: sci.physics, sci.space.tech       From: bondage@frontiernet.net              John Schoenfeld wrote:              [snip]              > > Um, yes, it is.       >       > No it is not. Imagine a stationary black-box floating in space. One       > wall of the box is hard iron and the opposite side is ellastic. If a       > ball is thrown from the middle at the hard iron wall there will be a       > high-impulse transfer of momentum from the ball to the box. Relative       > from the center of the box (which at this point is moving), the ball       > now approaches the opposite ellastic wall in which it inevitably       > collides with and transfers the same momentum but in the opposite       > direction bringing the box to rest again. However, the elastic wall       > collision was low-impulse and took longer for the momentum to be       > conservered. Irrespective of momentum conservation, there is an       > overall displacement.       >       > At this point we have the box at rest yet it is displaced from its       > original position, however in future time this same effect will occur       > but in the opposite direction and thus the overal motion of this       > contraption would be to OSCILLATE about the original position. So       > technically speaking, its not inertial propulsion yet as the center of       > mass is constant.       >       > So the third and final requirement would to have a constant stream of       > balls colliding just as the first one thus always staying one step       > ahead of the "backwards oscillation phase".               I think some past claims of reactionless drives that allegedly       reduced their weight (though never to zero, it seems) on scales, had       more to do with a similar phenomenon in the springs of the scale, then       actually providing a net upward force. Time your oscillations right, and       you can fool the scale, but not Mother Nature....              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca