eb598197   
   From: notreally@best.com   
      
   In article , "Icarus"   
    wrote:   
      
   > albright wrote:   
   > > Icarus wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> I viewed the area from the two images at the same scale side   
   > >> by side, and the resolution looks very similar to me. Very   
   > >> small pebbles visible in the panorama shot are also visible   
   > >> in the navigation camera shot (especially if you tweak the   
   > >> contrast and brightness), so I can't really see how something   
   > >> as obvious as the object in the panorama shot could be   
   > >> present at the time the second picture was taken and not be   
   > >> visible at all.   
   > >   
   > > looks like the field is different in the two pictures and the   
   > > nav pictures does not go far enough "south" (if you see   
   > > what I mean) to get the object into view ...   
   >   
   > Have a look at this and see what you think:   
   >   
   > http://www.envf.port.ac.uk/jr/object.html   
   >   
   > The image on the left is from the Sol 002 panoramic image, the   
   > one on the right is from the Sol 005 navigation camera image.   
      
   It looks like you are correct.  There is a small white feature to   
   the left of the same "row" that indicates these are equivalent   
   regions.  The "bug" is gone in the navcam image.   
      
   Either it blew away, or walked away, or ...   
   Does anyone know if the "bug" has been seen in _any_ image   
   other than the Sol 002 panorama?   
      
   PM   
      
   --   
   Email: lastname at best dot com.  No spam please.   
   All spam will be complained to sender's ISP.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)