Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.science    |    Space and planetary science and related    |    1,217 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 576 of 1,217    |
|    Henry Spencer to Makhno    |
|    Re: Question on the space elevator    |
|    07 Apr 04 02:38:51    |
   
   From: henry@spsystems.net   
      
   In article ,   
   Makhno wrote:   
   >There's a lot of traffic in this thread about powering the climber. Why   
   >can't it simply have a diesel/gasoline engine with its own oxygen supply?   
      
   Because the mass of fuel and oxygen is prohibitive for a climb that long.   
      
   >Or run electrical cables up the elevator to power an electric motor?   
      
   Transmitting useful amounts of electrical power thousands of kilometers   
   *without* adding significant mass to the cable is extremely difficult.   
   (The current near-term elevator designs have a total cable cross-section   
   of about one square millimeter. They don't have enough strength margin to   
   tolerate any significant increase in cross-section that doesn't add   
   strength too.)   
      
   >Why make things more complicated than they need to be?   
      
   Because they really do need to be that complicated.   
   --   
   MOST launched 30 June; science observations running | Henry Spencer   
   since Oct; first surprises seen; papers pending. | henry@spsystems.net   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca