home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.space.science      Space and planetary science and related      1,217 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 585 of 1,217   
   Gordon D. Pusch to Rick Jones   
   Re: Question on the space elevator   
   09 Apr 04 06:39:45   
   
   From: g_d_pusch_remove_underscores@xnet.com   
      
   Rick Jones  writes:   
      
   > Makhno  wrote:   
   >> This makes three assumptions, One is that we're air-breathing all   
   >> the way, which might not be too unreasonable because the hardest   
   >> part (where g is highest and the engine will be working its hardest)   
   >> has plenty of air. Even at high altititudes a super-charger or   
   >> similar technology could be applied to allow the engine to breath   
   >> the air, only switching to a liquid oxygen tank, or oxygen-less fuel   
   >> when truely in space.   
   >   
   > Could you be better off stopping part way up to fill the O2 tanks   
   > using those superchargers/whatever instead of lugging them up filled   
   > from the surface?  After all, you could just hang there on the tether   
   > right?   
      
   Please note that the density of the atmosphere is already negligible   
   at a mere 150 km of altitude, less than 0.4% of the way to GSO,   
   whereas the gravitational force at that altitude is still essentially   
   the same as that at "sea level." It will =NOT= be possible to use   
   "superchargers" to get oxygen from the air --- LOX tanks will be needed.   
      
      
   -- Gordon D. Pusch   
      
   perl -e '$_ = "gdpusch\@NO.xnet.SPAM.com\n"; s/NO\.//; s/SPAM\.//; print;'   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca