Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.science    |    Space and planetary science and related    |    1,217 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 721 of 1,217    |
|    Zdenek Jizba to Nalin Ratnayake    |
|    Re: Another question    |
|    28 Sep 04 15:45:37    |
      From: jizba@verizon.net              Nalin Ratnayake wrote:              > Could you clarify what you mean by "defining three dimensional space"?       > I'm not wuite sure I understand what you mean.       >               According to Brian Greene (The Elegant Universe) the latest theory       of Everything is called M-theory. It postulates the 10 dimensional       Calabi-Yau space in which the extra dimensions are curled up. Objects       in this space can be one dimensional (strings) two dimensional (membranes)              three dimensional (3-branes) and conceivably with even higher       dimensions. (I am not sure my explanation is correct but it is probably       close.)              A 3-brane would be an object that fills a space of three dimensions. My       suggestion (feel free to call this my fantasy) is that at the beginning       of the "big bang" when the exponential expansion (inflation) got started,       space and the mass of the universe were small. However under the       temperature of 10^28 degrees K, strings as well as other "branes"       including 3-branes started to replicate (think of popcorn) in such a way       that the high temperature was maintained. This process may have       continued indefinitely, except that the 3-branes overtook the mass       particles so that the expansion cooled to the point where only 3-branes       continued to increase leaving the total mass of the universe at its       present state.              >       > Thanks,       > N.       >       > Zdenek Jizba wrote:       > > I just finished reading Brian Greene's "The Elegant       > > Universe". The section in chapter 15 titled "What are       > > Space and Time, Really, and can we do without them?"       > > suggests in my mind a tantalizing question:       > >       > > "Is there an elementary particle (possibly related       > > to the graviton) which defines three dimensional space?       > >       > > Any comments on this would be appreciated.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca