Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.science    |    Space and planetary science and related    |    1,217 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 733 of 1,217    |
|    Logan Kearsley to All    |
|    Re: Gravity and the big bang    |
|    22 Nov 04 01:51:26    |
      From: chrono.surfer@verizon.net              > As for the tennis ball, (I wrote also in another response) does       > a tennis ball have gravity simply based on its spherical       > shape, mass, and density? If true, I suspect measurements       > have been taken on such isolated bodies. I would like       > to read further on that subject. Any references?              No. A tennis ball has gravity based on its mass alone.              Measurements have, in fact, been made on small bodies. I don't know the       reference off the top of my head, but the experiment is pretty simple:              Get three equivalent weights, a tripod, a length of string, and a bar.       Attach two of the weights to opposite ends of the bar. Hang the bar from the       tripod with the string and balance it. Wait for it to come completely to       rest. Place the third weight a short distance away from one of the other two       weights. Wait a few days. If the string isn't too springy / resistant to       twisting, then the gravity of the two weights will have pulled the together.              -l.       ------------------------------------       My inbox is a sacred shrine, none shall enter that are not worthy.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca