Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.science    |    Space and planetary science and related    |    1,217 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 777 of 1,217    |
|    =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Rodrigo_Nuno_Bragan to Tim Killian    |
|    Re: Huygens' Titan Descent    |
|    17 Jan 05 13:47:15    |
      XPost: sci.astro.amateur       From: rodrigo.cunha@corp.vodafone.pt              Probably both, but mostly engineering.              RTGs generate a LOT of heat, witch would be difficult to deal with       inside the closed reentry shell of that small probe.              For instance, an RTG generating 200W eletric power generates >2000W heat       power.              It's also heavy, generates radiation, witch is bad for the       instruments... etc.              Tim Killian wrote:       > Was the lack of an RTG on Huygens a political decision, or a true       > engineering limitation?       >       >       >       > Scott M. Kozel wrote:       >       >       >>       >> The Huygens spacecraft could not utilize an RTG or solar power, so it       >> was limited to un-rechargable batteries, and given the number of       >> instruments on board, battery capacity was limited to a matter of hours.       >>       >              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca