Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.science    |    Space and planetary science and related    |    1,217 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 793 of 1,217    |
|    Volker Hetzer to hankman    |
|    Re: Data channel "glitch" on Huygens    |
|    19 Jan 05 09:52:19    |
      XPost: sci.astro, sci.astro.amateur       From: volker.hetzer@gmx.de              hankman wrote:       > I still do not have a clear picture of exactly what was lost due to the       > glitches with the data channel on Huygens. Most reports just barely mention       > the glitch and most do not even mention it and none are clear on just what       > data was lost and what was recovered, and how it was recovered.       >       > Some seem to indicate that nearly nothing was lost due to the fact that the       > channels were redundant and the data was duplicated over both channels.       > Others seem to indicate that the "recovered" data was due to the       > "eavesdropping" of the earth-based radio telescopes. Yet other reports seem       > to indicate that half (some 350 of 700) the images were completely lost (and       > not recovered by some other means such as redundancy of channels or       > eavesdropping from earth).       >       > Can anyone shed some light on these issues and why the media seem shy to       > dwell more on these matters as well on the notable successes of the mission.              The data transmisssion of the huygens probe was to go over two channels       of the cassini probe. Accidentally, only one of these channels was       actually switched on, so all taba going over the dead channel was lost.       OTOH, every group with an experiment on huygens could choose how they       utilized those channels for their data. Many groups chose to send       essentially the same data (or enough redundancy) over both channels,       sacrifying data amount for safety. They were ok.              The images experiment didn't and instead chose to send half of the       images over each channel, so half the images are lost. IMHO they       couldn't have done any better since any redundancy would have cost them       images anyway.              The doppler wind experiment chose to use one channel only, unfortunately       the dead one. So all of that data is lost too. Incidentally, a lot of       radio telescopes were able to track the probes descent with a precision       of 1km and from that trajectory much information about the winds could       still be gained so that the guy wanting to know about winds on titan       has some data nevertheless by analyzing how the probe got bounced around       during descend.              Hope this helps.       Volker              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca