Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.science    |    Space and planetary science and related    |    1,217 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 825 of 1,217    |
|    Chuck Stewart to Steve J    |
|    Re: Titan photo quality ?    |
|    22 Jan 05 05:14:28    |
      From: zapkitty@gmx.co.uk              On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:37:55 +0000, Steve J wrote:              > Why are the photos that return from titan not perfect, dont get me wrong its       > a bloody amazing achievment to land a probe there, but surely thats the       > difficult bit, if a picture is received from a quality camera which I assume       > it is, surely the picture should be perfect, or is the data fragmented.              Because Huygens was an add-on to Cassini, and landing was an afterthought       to an atmosphereic probe, and surving landing was chancy at best so they       didn't waste a lot of time or resources on what basically the bottom of       the science-return food chain :)              Huygens purpose was gathering atmosphereic data. Everything else was       a (very nice!) bonus.              --       Chuck Stewart       "Anime-style catgirls: Threat? Menace? Or just studying algebra?"              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca