home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.space.science      Space and planetary science and related      1,217 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 873 of 1,217   
   Andrew Gray to Ken Taylor   
   Re: Radiation-safe orbits   
   01 Mar 05 18:05:56   
   
   XPost: sci.space.tech   
   From: andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk   
      
   On 2005-02-28, Ken Taylor  wrote:   
   > "Jim McCauley"  wrote in message   
   > news:421ebc7e$0$42486$75868355@news.frii.net...   
   >> I realize that all spacecraft require some degree of radiation hardening,   
   >> but within reasonable limits, what are the altitude ranges that might be   
   >> recommended for earth satellites for equatorial orbit? I understand that   
   >> there are two particularly intense belts of radiation; at what altitudes   
   >> might they best be avoided?   
   >   
   > Equatorial orbit (geosynchronous orbit) is *only* at (approx) 35,000km.   
      
   Note that whilst geosynchronous orbits are equatorial, equatorial orbits   
   do not have to be geosynchronous; you can quite happily have a satellite   
   in LEO, just at an orbital inclination of zero degrees.   
      
   --   
   -Andrew Gray   
    andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca