home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.space.science      Space and planetary science and related      1,217 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 895 of 1,217   
   Dr John Stockton to All   
   Re: Inclination change: worst case   
   23 Mar 05 13:12:07   
   
   From: spam@merlyn.demon.co.uk   
      
   JRS:  In article <1111494263.223713.54600@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,   
   dated Tue, 22 Mar 2005 04:24:23, seen in news:sci.space.science,   
   Cray74@gmail.com  posted :   
   >   
   >Monte Davis wrote:   
   >> Dumb question: If one were in circular LEO and crazy enough to want a   
   >> 90-degree change of inclination, what's the cost in delta-v? Is it,   
   >as   
   >> intuition is telling me, equivalent to throwing away all your ~9 kps   
   >> and re-acquiring it all?   
   >   
   >At first glance, a brute force 90-degree plane change would require   
   >1.414x (square root 2 times) as much delta-V as it took to get to   
   >orbit, so 7.8x1.4=11km/s. You have to kill all that horizontal velocity   
   >and replace it with orbital velocity perpendicular to your first.   
      
   But separately they need Root2 times the delta-V of doing them together,   
   and that way one can be less hasty for a given loss of altitude.   
      
   >It would, in fact, be less costly in delta-V to do something like   
   >accelerate to escape velocity (~3.3km/s above orbital velocity), drift   
   >up to about the L1 point or swing around the moon, and drop back to   
   >Earth in a new, desired orbit. I think.   
      
   Let orbital velocity V have magnitude 1.0 units.  Then the right-angle   
   plane change, done be a rapid burn at 45 degrees to original-forwards,   
   needs delta-V of Root2 units, as you say.   
      
   Burns to/from escape velocity needs dV of Root2-1, and plane change is   
   free at infinity.  That dV, applied directly, gives a plane change of   
   2(arcsin(Root2-1) which is about 48.94 degrees,   
      
   Lesser changes than that are better done directly, greater ones better   
   via infinity.  With corrections for practicalities, using lunar gravity,   
   etc.   
      
   OTOH ISTR being corrected on this or a similar matter before; possibly   
   it is better for angles near that to burn to a higher but finite apogee,   
   change plane there, and return.   
      
   --   
    © John Stockton, Surrey, UK.  ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk   Turnpike v4.00   MIME. ©   
    Web   - FAQqish topics, acronyms & links;   
     Astro stuff via astron-1.htm, gravity0.htm ; quotings.htm, pascal.htm, etc.   
    No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca