Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.science    |    Space and planetary science and related    |    1,217 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 94 of 1,217    |
|    Randall R Schulz to download the whole internet    |
|    Re: looking into the past???    |
|    21 Aug 03 21:25:56    |
      From: rrschulz@cris.com              DTWI,              I don't know what a "plonker" is but...                     You are correct. Light travels at a finite speed. Viewing more distant       stars and galaxies is implicitly viewing the more distant past. This       is an advantage in that it allows one to test hypotheses about how the       universe evolved from its origins. If all we could see was the current       state of the universe, it would me much harder to figure out how       things have evolved over cosmic timescales.              The universe is a little under 14 billion years old. The universe is       much bigger than 14 billion light-years in diameter. We cannot see it       all. Ever. (Unless we figure out how to base a technology on some       of the solutions to general relativity that do not rule out       superluminal travel. Then maybe we could travel beyond the so-called       light horizon of the portion of the universe centered on Earth. Our       current expectation is that we'd find things over there pretty much       the same as they are here, at least as far as star, galaxy, cluster       and super-cluster formation goes.)              The oldest and hence most distantly originating photons (light) we can       detect is the so-called Cosmic Microwave Background. Studying it       carefully has helped refine theories of the origin of the universe.              This is all elementary stuff (otherwise I could not tell you about it,       'cause I'm an amateur). There are many texts and on-line resources.              Libraries, science teachers and Google are your friends. If you're not       already familiar with them, become so!              Randall Schulz                     download the whole internet wrote:              > OK, this is just a thought but... If the nearest star is 4 light       > years away then we are seeing light which is 4 years old?? So what       > we are looking at is the past??? Is this right? Or am I a plonker??       > If this is right.. then somewhere out there in the universe there       > is light from millions of years ago showing how the world began???       > Would this work???              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca