Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.science    |    Space and planetary science and related    |    1,217 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 957 of 1,217    |
|    Camaronat to All    |
|    Re: Space travel problems    |
|    27 Jul 05 20:56:22    |
      From: Camaronat.1sunlr@spacebanter.com              Everything has pretty much been covered, but there are a couple of       things to consider.              First, the big reason why we still use conventional rockets over       spaceplanes is weight. Weight is the big killer. In a rocket, your       weight is basically broken up into outer structure, engine, payload,       payload adapter, electronics, and fuel. In a spaceplane, you have all       of the same stuff to deal with as a rocket, but you also have extra       weight in your structure, an air breathing engine, and fuel for that       engine. It is just more economical, at the moment, to use rockets.              Second, SpaceShip One didn't need to worry about heat shielding because       of its design, as personaljazz said. The increased drag slows down the       craft much faster, and as a result, it doesn't heat up. The Mercury       pods used heat shielding, and Alan Shepard's flight reached about       5000mph.                     --       Camaronat              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca