Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,209 of 3,113    |
|    Paul F. Dietz to Gordon D. Pusch    |
|    Re: Antimatter propulsion    |
|    15 Jan 04 18:20:54    |
      From: dietz@dls.net              Gordon D. Pusch wrote:              >>I suspect EMP will be much, much worse.       >       >       > Almost certainly incorrect, since the gamma-ray energy will be released       > over a very long timescale compared to the cyclotron frequency of electrons       > in the Earth's magnetic field. Since the gammas are not released as a       > sharp pulse, they will not be able to excite coherent electron cyclotron       > oscillations in the ionosphere; therefore, EMP effects will in fact be       > quite weak compared to a nuclear weapon of comparable yield.              I don't think the ion cyclotron period is the relevant timescale, Gordon.              Near the Earth, you get EMP because there's an asymmetry in the       current induced by the Compton-scattered electrons. The magnetic       field doesn't come into play at all.              Above the atmosphere, the EMP is due to the asymmetry in the currents produced       by the Earth's magnetic field. The electrons spiral around the magnetic       field lines, but their net motion is north and south.               Paul              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca