Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,244 of 3,113    |
|    Gordon D. Pusch to All    |
|    Re: Antimatter propulsion    |
|    19 Jan 04 14:30:39    |
      From: g_d_pusch_remove_underscores@xnet.com              I wrote:              > Muon mean range is about 1.8 km in vacuum; in most forms of matter       > (including air) muon range is around 1 gm/cm^2 at energies above 100 MeV,       > so dividing by the sea-level density of air, the muon mean range is about       > 8.5 meters.              ...Unfortunately, however, I have just realized that I was reading       the wrong curve on the graph in the Particle Data Book; the actual muon       range is on the order of 200--300 gm/cm^2, so the muon range in air       is essentially the same as in vacuum. Mea culpa... :-(              This implies that the energy deposited in the air around the bomb will be       even more diffuse than I had thought, further weakening the already weak       "blast effect" component, and making a "pure" matter/antimatter bomb w/out       a high-Z "tamper" even more nearly an "enhanced radiation weapon." To get a       high explosive yield out of the thing, one will need to wrap it in a tungsten       or uranium "tamper" to absorb the charged pions and the pi-zero decay gammas       (the latter would be more than a little "dirty," since the energetic pions       and pi-zero decay gammas will induce a lot of fissions and photofissions...).                     -- Gordon D. Pusch              perl -e '$_ = "gdpusch\@NO.xnet.SPAM.com\n"; s/NO\.//; s/SPAM\.//; print;'              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca