home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.space.tech      Technical and general issues related to      3,113 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,244 of 3,113   
   Gordon D. Pusch to All   
   Re: Antimatter propulsion   
   19 Jan 04 14:30:39   
   
   From: g_d_pusch_remove_underscores@xnet.com   
      
   I wrote:   
      
   > Muon mean range is about 1.8 km in vacuum; in most forms of matter   
   > (including air) muon range is around 1 gm/cm^2 at energies above 100 MeV,   
   > so dividing by the sea-level density of air, the muon mean range is about   
   > 8.5 meters.   
      
   ...Unfortunately, however, I have just realized that I was reading   
   the wrong curve on the graph in the Particle Data Book; the actual muon   
   range is on the order of 200--300 gm/cm^2, so the muon range in air   
   is essentially the same as in vacuum. Mea culpa... :-(   
      
   This implies that the energy deposited in the air around the bomb will be   
   even more diffuse than I had thought, further weakening the already weak   
   "blast effect" component, and making a "pure" matter/antimatter bomb w/out   
   a high-Z "tamper" even more nearly an "enhanced radiation weapon." To get a   
   high explosive yield out of the thing, one will need to wrap it in a tungsten   
   or uranium "tamper" to absorb the charged pions and the pi-zero decay gammas   
   (the latter would be more than a little "dirty," since the energetic pions   
   and pi-zero decay gammas will induce a lot of fissions and photofissions...).   
      
      
   -- Gordon D. Pusch   
      
   perl -e '$_ = "gdpusch\@NO.xnet.SPAM.com\n"; s/NO\.//; s/SPAM\.//; print;'   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca