Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,247 of 3,113    |
|    Ian Woollard to Mike Miller    |
|    Re: Air breathing Engines    |
|    19 Jan 04 20:59:04    |
      From: junkmail@wolfkeeper.plus.com              Mike Miller wrote:       > The point of SSTOs never involves weight efficiency - you'd use       > multi-stage designs if you want to put a lot of weight into orbit       > relative to the upper stage mass. (Well, Orion SSTOs kinda buck that       > trend, but Orion SSTOs have issues of their own.) The point of SSTOs       > is COST. Only 1 vehicle to dust off, reload, refuel, and relaunch.              More to the point; only one vehicle to design. That means you only need       half the R&D staff (in principle), this saves lots of money, since the       up-front capital costs are half the cost of launch.              OTOH, you have a riskier program; and that increases the cost of       borrowing money.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca