home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.space.tech      Technical and general issues related to      3,113 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,247 of 3,113   
   Ian Woollard to Mike Miller   
   Re: Air breathing Engines   
   19 Jan 04 20:59:04   
   
   From: junkmail@wolfkeeper.plus.com   
      
   Mike Miller wrote:   
   > The point of SSTOs never involves weight efficiency - you'd use   
   > multi-stage designs if you want to put a lot of weight into orbit   
   > relative to the upper stage mass. (Well, Orion SSTOs kinda buck that   
   > trend, but Orion SSTOs have issues of their own.) The point of SSTOs   
   > is COST. Only 1 vehicle to dust off, reload, refuel, and relaunch.   
      
   More to the point; only one vehicle to design. That means you only need   
   half the R&D staff (in principle), this saves lots of money, since the   
   up-front capital costs are half the cost of launch.   
      
   OTOH, you have a riskier program; and that increases the cost of   
   borrowing money.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca