Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,259 of 3,113    |
|    Arie Kazachin to All    |
|    HST: why considered "dead" without Shutt    |
|    21 Jan 04 01:06:22    |
      From: ariek@attglobal3.14159265358979323846.net.retro.com              Hello!              I've read in few articles dealing with the priorities change       in NASA that HST will be let to naturally die as a result of Shuttle       service missions cancellation. Why is it considered such an absolute       requirement to have a manned service mission? If memory serves, a Shuttle       mission cost is around 450-475 M$, how much could it cost to designin       a robotic mission? Take the design of the Shuttle's RMS or maybe even       the complete hardware if spares exist, attach to it another similar "arm"       with different "tool-holding adaptors", also attach few cameras, telemetry       and have some fuel reserve to boost the HST to a higher orbit. Launch       the "thing", attach it the same way Shuttles RMS would attach and boost it       to a higher orbit or perform a repair via telemetry, with the operator       wearing a VR gougles.              How difficult/expensive such a design/mission would be?              ******************************************************************************       * Arie Kazachin, Israel, e-mail: ariek@attglobal3.14159265358979323846.net *       ******************************************************************************       NOTE: before replying, leave only letters in my domain-name. Sorry, SPAM trap.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca