home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.space.tech      Technical and general issues related to      3,113 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,479 of 3,113   
   Gordon D. Pusch to Roger Stokes   
   Re: He3 on asteroids?   
   05 Feb 04 01:54:53   
   
   XPost: sci.space.policy   
   From: g_d_pusch_remove_underscores@xnet.com   
   Copy: rstokes1@san.rr.com   
      
   "Roger Stokes"  writes:   
      
   > "Gordon D. Pusch"  wrote in message   
   > news:gid690nnik.fsf@pusch.xnet.com...   
   >> He3 is a rare isotope, cosmically speaking --- only 1.37 ppm of all helium   
   >> is He3.   
   >>   
   >>> Probably makes more sense to use solar cells instead.   
   >>   
   >> Especially since we haven't a =CLUE= how to burn He3 in a fusion   
   >> reactor, and if Todd Rider's Ph.D. Dissertation is correct, there may be   
   >> be fundamental thermodynamic reasons why =ANY= He3-burning "reactor"   
   >> smaller than a brown dwarf will consume more energy than it generates...   
   >   
   > Even at .7 ppb of the Earth's atmosphere, I assume it must still be   
   > cheaper right now to refine it on Earth and try some fusion experiments,   
   > rather than go to the moon to get it - what's the reason it hasn't been   
   > done?   
      
   Apparently you haven't been paying attention: We can't even ingite   
   the _EASIEST_ fusion reaction, D/T, yet (except in bombs) and He3   
   is _MORE THAN AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE HARDER TO INGITE_ than D/T.   
   So there's no _point_ in attempting to try it !!!   
      
      
   -- Gordon D. Pusch   
      
   perl -e '$_ = "gdpusch\@NO.xnet.SPAM.com\n"; s/NO\.//; s/SPAM\.//; print;'   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca