Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,725 of 3,113    |
|    John Schilling to Bob Martin    |
|    Re: Future Space War    |
|    14 Apr 04 15:41:44    |
      XPost: sci.military.moderated       From: schillin@spock.usc.edu              rellim113@hotmail.com (Bob Martin) writes:              >> Read it again - the book specifically noted that they built (and       >> later used) a backup catapult, with its own fusion plant, concealed to       >> avoid bombing by the UN forces. And that the secret weapon remained a       >> secret long after the war ended.              >Which book was this? I've read Starship Troopers and I'm trying to       >figure out which of his other ones would be good/similar to that one.                     The book many people here are referring to and nobody is actually       naming because everybody assumes everybody else knows what it is,       is Robert A. Heinlein's "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress", published       in 1966.              One of the classics, tMiaHM shows up on an awful lot of "top ten       science fiction novels ever" lists, so you'd need a pretty good       reason *not* to find and read it. One possible such reason is that       it is rather dated; if you can't rewind your brain forty years you       may bounce off parts of it.                     The general plot is that, in 2076-as-forecast-from-1966, the denizens       of a Lunar penal colony decide they've had enough of taking orders       from Earth and organize a revolution. The particular bit that is       relevant here is their choice of weaponry - they can make small arms       locally, but their way of bringing the war to Earth is to use an       electromagnetic catapult that used to launch hundred-ton cargo barges       on an Earthward trajectory, to launch hundred-ton rocks instead.              A hundred tons of rock free-falling from the Moon to the Earth will       arrive with, and liberate on impact, kinetic energy comparable to       the Hiroshima Slum Clearance Event. So it makes for a nice show of       force.              Unfortunately, this is one of those parts that's a bit dated. In       1966, it was a reasonably well thought extrapolation, but in the       years since people who can afford to put more time into doing the       math than can even a diligent SF writer have found the relevant       scaling laws: electromagnetic catapults get a *lot* more expensive       as you make the payload bigger, and only a little more expensive       as you make the repetition rate higher.              So anything built for mercantile rather than military purposes, as       was the original lunar catapult in tMiaHM, will be designed to launch       hundred-pound buckets every second rather than hundred-ton barges every       hour. And a hundred-pound projectile will shed almost all of its energy       harmlessly in the upper atmosphere.                     Still a good story, you just have to remember that much of the technical       extrapolation is obsolete.                     --       *John Schilling * "Anything worth doing, *       *Member:AIAA,NRA,ACLU,SAS,LP * is worth doing for money" *       *Chief Scientist & General Partner * -13th Rule of Acquisition *       *White Elephant Research, LLC * "There is no substitute *       *schillin@spock.usc.edu * for success" *       *661-951-9107 or 661-275-6795 * -58th Rule of Acquisition *              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca