Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,801 of 3,113    |
|    Nick Maclaren to Christopher M. Jones    |
|    Re: Daytime Starlight    |
|    11 May 04 08:27:12    |
      From: nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk              In article <72d32143.0405081423.3115a96f@posting.google.com>, ve       emite@dualboot.net (Christopher M. Jones) writes:       |> cray74@hotmail.com (Mike Miller) wrote in message news:<5dcb4       db.0405061609.78da1818@posting.google.com>...       |> > What is the threshold of brightness for seeing an astronomical object       |> > in the daytime Earth sky?              This part of your question isn't well phrased, I am afraid. It       depends immensely what you mean by 'the daytime Earth sky'.       Depending on conditions, Venus may be visible, or the sun may       be invisible. There is a lot of variation even in cloudless       skies - it isn't rare to be unable to feel the heat of an       unobscured sun, for example.              |> > Specifically, would a star with 70% of Sol's absolute brightness be       |> > visible at 45 AU?       |>       |> Yes. It would be hundreds of times brighter than a       |> full moon.              In almost all cloudless skies, yes, but I have seen conditions       hazy enough that a full moon was effectively invisible. It is       possible that they can be much more extreme.                     Regards,       Nick Maclaren.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca