Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,883 of 3,113    |
|    Daniel Walker to All    |
|    Re: SpaceShipOne and reentry heat    |
|    24 Jun 04 17:23:40    |
      From: dw229@hermes.cam.ac.uk              Reading these postings about SS1's re-entry and from what we've heard       recently regarding the space shuttle's TPS and its problems, why have       spacecraft tended not to use engine-based deceleration to reduce the       thermal effect of re-entry? If the orbital velocity is a major factor in       re-entry speed, why not take this off and just drop in? Dropping in from       400km would give you a nominal speed of ~2.8km/s if you reached the       Earth's surface (assuming I've done my sums right!).              I imagine the answers will involve the excess fuel needed, manoeuvring,       restartable engines, etc., so at what point (what altitude) does the       weight of thermal protection tiles beat the extra fuel needed for an       orbital craft? I know there's lots of variables involved, but wondered if       anyone had considered this?              Dan              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca