Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,003 of 3,113    |
|    Simon Hosie to Gene P.    |
|    Re: Dyson Sphere - Why Inside?    |
|    17 Jul 04 12:24:28    |
      XPost: comp.theory.cell-automata       From: gumboot@REM-alnhatetnl-OVEclear.net.nz.retro.com              Gene P. wrote:       > Why does every variant of these structures I've read about insist on       > living INSIDE the structure and using spin or unobtainium as a proxy for       > gravity?       >       > Why not live OUTSIDE the shell and let solar gravity hold you down.              Firstly, is gravity really all that important? If you're fussing over       all the environmental conditions that make life on earth work right then       you've got bigger problems than gravity. With the scale of the project,       I'd have thought people would be happy to wait for suitable lifeforms to       evolve. Although, you risk playing a eugenics game, there. Is that it?       Is gravity only necessary to avoid the e-word?              Is the shell itself supposed to be weightless? If not, can't its       gravity be put to some use? I'm using this here 'Earth' collection       plate at the moment, and it seems to be working out alright. I haven't       fallen off once.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca