Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,071 of 3,113    |
|    John Schilling to Steve Willner    |
|    Re: Cassini's engine?    |
|    11 Aug 04 16:55:37    |
      From: schillin@spock.usc.edu              willner@cfa.harvard.edu (Steve Willner) writes:              >schillin@spock.usc.edu (John Schilling) wrote in message news:<       d9kj6$t4u$1@spock.usc.edu>...       >> WFNA (White Fuming Nitric Acid) and the hydrocarbon or alcohol of your       >> choice fits the bill, assuming you stick to the short list of materials       >> immune to WFNA.              >A side question if you don't mind... Henry also mentioned WFNA as a       >possible oxidizer. Why is it superior to RFNA? I seem to recall RFNA       >actually being used on some early rockets, but I don't think WFNA has       >been. What makes one better than the other? Historical comments       >would be welcome, too.                     It isn't; I had a brain fart and got the two reversed.              Red Fuming Nitric Acid offers better performance, *and* better long-term       storability, than White. WFNA is somewhat safer to handle in the short       term, rather less in the way of corrosive and toxic fumes, but LOX is       safer still and has better performance than either, if you don't care       about long-term storability.              Nitric acid got a lot of early use, but as experience built up other       oxidizers turned out to be better for most applications and the one       niche left for nitric acid was tactical missile propulsion, usually       in combination with a suitable hydrocarbon. This called for the       long-term storability of RFNA.              The most famous application of RFNA is probably the old Soviet       R-11/SS-1/"Scud" series of short-range ballistic missiles, which       used RFNA/kerosene in the 1950s and RFNA/hydrazine in the '60s.       The last application I know of along those lines was the Swedish       Rb.05 tactical air-to-surface missile, introduced in the early       1970s. Since then, improved solid motors have pretty much taken       over the tactical missile niche.                     --       *John Schilling * "Anything worth doing, *       *Member:AIAA,NRA,ACLU,SAS,LP * is worth doing for money" *       *Chief Scientist & General Partner * -13th Rule of Acquisition *       *White Elephant Research, LLC * "There is no substitute *       *schillin@spock.usc.edu * for success" *       *661-718-0955 or 661-275-6795 * -58th Rule of Acquisition *              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca