Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,077 of 3,113    |
|    Jeff Findley to All    |
|    Re: Brute force re-entry    |
|    12 Aug 04 09:48:20    |
      From: jeff.findley@ugs.nojunk.com              "Lizerd" <1@2.com.retro.com> wrote in message       news:4ofSc.425593$Gx4.392265@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...       > Early on in the space program, the space capsule used brute force       re-entry.       > IE: it slammed into the upper atmosphere at high speed to slow down for       > return.              That's a fairly accurate description.              > The space shuttle is a lifting body.       > Why can't it fly back???              Because it first needs to shed most of it's orbital velocity before it can       "fly". That means a re-entry very similar to that flown by capsules (a very       high angle of attack that generally presents the bottom of the orbiter to       the worst of the air flow instead of the nose). Once the speed is low       enough, the shuttle lowers the angle of attack and transitions to gliding       flight.              > If the shuttle hit the atmosphere slower, use aero braking and descend at       > a shallower angle, the shuttle could return at a slower decent rate, and       not       > be subjected to the high temptures.              How exactly would you propose to shed this extreme orbital velocity?              Jeff       --       Remove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca