Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,088 of 3,113    |
|    Alcore to Bill Bonde ( ``Soli Deo Gloria'' )    |
|    Re: Brute force re-entry    |
|    19 Aug 04 09:56:35    |
      From: alcore@uurth.com       Copy: sci-space-tech@moderators.isc.org              On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Bill Bonde ( ``Soli Deo Gloria'' ) wrote:              >Lizerd wrote:       >>       >> Re: Brute force re-entry       >>       >I wouldn't have expected using the atmosphere to slow you down would be       >considered using a 'brute force' method of slowing down. I would think       >it would be considered elegant, and spending fuel to slow down or just       >running directly into the planet at full speed would be consider the       >brute force approaches.              I think the point that he was trying to make was that given the steep       angle of re-entry that NASA always uses, you might as well be "running       directly into the planet at full speed" instead of "skipping repeatedly       off the top of the atmosphere to shed speed".              I think the basic idea here is that there is a *lot* of energy being shed       by steep re-entry... and if there's enough energy to heat the air blasting       past the spacecraft into a plasma, is doesn't *seem* like so much of a       stretch to try and use some of that energy to alter the spacecraft       trajectory upwardly... in order to deliberately remain in the thinnest air       possible or even deflect completely outside the atmosphere briefly.       Which in turn, should reduce the heat loading. (Or at least stretch out       the heat loading over a long enough period of time to allow some scheme to       manage it more efficiently.)              Conceptually you might deliberately use a series of shrinking sub-orbital       skips to shed speed (while within the upper atmosphere) and then heat       (while above the atmosphere) in alternation until the final sub-orbital       entry *can't* be shaped back into a trajectory that climbs above the       atmosphere again.              All that plasma rushing by the outer skin of the spacecraft just seems       like an energy resources that just begs to be harnessed and manipulated.       (The phrase "Magneto-Hydrodynamic Boundary Layer Control" comes to mind.)              Gene Pharr       Slidell, LA                            --       Alcore Nilth - The Mad Alchemist of Gevbeck       alcore@uurth.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca