home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.space.tech      Technical and general issues related to      3,113 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,090 of 3,113   
   Erik Max Francis to Russell Wallace   
   Re: O'Neill habitat spin axis   
   24 Aug 04 15:54:39   
   
   XPost: rec.arts.sf.science   
   From: max@alcyone.com   
      
   Russell Wallace wrote:   
      
   > I'd ideally like to point it at the sun. Then the nearside cap could   
   > be coated in solar cells while the rest of the surface is painted   
   > black to help radiate heat.   
   >   
   > But in that case, it seems that a quarter orbit later it'll be side on   
   > to the sun, another quarter orbit the opposite end will point at the   
   > sun etc, since conservation of angular momentum will tend to keep the   
   > spin axis pointing in the same direction relative to the rest of the   
   > universe, not relative to the sun.   
   >   
   > Is there any way to change that (I mean, reasonable ways, i.e. without   
   > expending propellant or using huge gyroscopes etc)?   
      
   No, there isn't.   
      
   > For example,   
   > Earth's axis precesses every 26,000 years IIRC; how does that square   
   > with conservation of angular momentum?   
      
   Because the Earth is not a uniform sphere (it bulges at the equator),   
   the force due to gravity from the Sun applies a torque on the Earth.   
   That torque changes the Earth's angular momentum.   
      
   Since the Sun is applying a torque, this changes the angular momentum of   
   the Earth, and results in precession.   
      
   > Is there a way a habitat's axis   
   > could be made to "precess" through a full circle every year?   
      
   The only way would be applying a large, constant external torque.  (Your   
   habitat would likely precess due to solar gravity as well, but on   
   timescales far too long to be useful for you.)   
      
   > Or if not, is the best solution then to orient it vertically, let most   
   > of the surface be mirror colored, and paint the end caps black?   
      
   By "vertically" I presume you mean so that the axis is parallel to the   
   revolution axis.  That would probably be the most sensible, if you want   
   the solar power generation to be intrinsic to the habitat itself (rather   
   than, say, beamed from a solar power facility in closer solar orbit).   
      
   --   
    __ Erik Max Francis && max@alcyone.com && http://www.alcyone.com/max/   
   /  \ San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && AIM erikmaxfrancis   
   \__/ If anything is sacred, the human body is sacred.   
       -- Walt Whitman   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca