Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,163 of 3,113    |
|    G. R. L. Cowan to Rodney Kelp    |
|    Re: Plutonium Batteries    |
|    23 Nov 04 19:45:44    |
      From: gcowan@eagle.ca              Rodney Kelp wrote:       >       > Well then, a practical use for high level nuclear waste would be in electric       > cars with RTG's.              Not practical for various reasons (I suppose probably not serious,       but anyway). One, cars seldom run all day and all night; better never,       I can tell you.       Two, plutonium-238 isn't nuclear waste, but an intentionally       made radioisotope of high thermal power and very low penetrating       radiation.       Three, there isn't enough actual nuclear waste, if these other problems       were solved, to power any worthwhile number of cars.                     --- Graham Cowan, former hydrogen fan       http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/Paper_for_11th_CHC.doc --       "Boron: A Better Energy Carrier than Hydrogen?"              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca