Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,169 of 3,113    |
|    Earl Colby Pottinger to All    |
|    Re: Sun Sensors for Attitude Determinati    |
|    24 Nov 04 14:36:45    |
      XPost: sci.physics, sci.electronics.design       From: earlcp@idirect.com              dave.harper@gmail.com (David Harper) :              > I'm interested in developing a sun sensor (or maybe a horizon sensor)       > for a low-cost, amateur, high altitude project. However, I'm having       > some difficulty determining the best setup for the sun sensor. The       > majority of the sensing will occur over 20km (about 65,000 ft), so the       > effects of radiation from the sky can be considered minimal.       >       > I was considering two methods:       >       > The first involves 5 photocells mounted at 90 degree angles to each       > other (one pointed vertically), with a light shield mounted below       > allowing a half-angle of around 60 degrees (i.e. blocking the light       > from the earth, so long as the sensor is 30 degrees from vertical or       > less). Measuring the resistance of all 5 photocells should yield       > (with the appropriate calculations) the position of the sun wrt the       > photocells. One concern I have about this method is the large       > variation of performance of photocells (regardless of having the same       > part number), and would probably require some careful calibration.       >       > The other method is to have a sheilded field of, say, X by X       > photocells and a single opening centered over it. This method is much       > more "coarse", expensive, and harder to make, but less suseptable to       > non-solar radiation. I'm aware that most "non-amateur" sun sensors       > use CCDs instead of photocells, but I believe that is a little beyond       > my experience (and budget).       >       > Does anyone else have knowledge of other techniques involved in sun       > sensors? Are any photocells or other light sensors better (or more       > precise) than others? Also, are there any wavelength filters I should       > consider? Any info is greatly appreciated!              Using Google I found http://www.redrok.com/electron.htm this is single axis       but uses cheap leds as the sensors, this suggest that you can make a 3 by 3       or 5 by 5 sensor without breaking the bank.              Also lots more hits on:       http://www.google.ca/search?num=100&q=diy+sun+sensor+tracker              --       I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos,       SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to       the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca