Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,299 of 3,113    |
|    " |
|    Re: LH2/LOX in the first stage    |
|    02 Jan 05 22:52:22    |
      From: zili@home              Am 29 Dec 2004 22:57:15 -0800 schrieb "Ilpo Lagerstedt":              >Why not any first stage with LH2/LOX before Delta IV?       >Maybe this is a dump question too but I have always wondered that: How       >much powerful Saturn 5 would have been LH2/LOX in the first stage?               The question is NOT how much (much more) powerful a LOX/LH2 driven       1st Saturn V stage would have been. The primary questions are: How       large would such a stage have become, and: Who would when be able to       develop the necessary large engines?               It WAS a problem to make them in time to reach the great goal of       delivering humans to the moon before completion of the 60's decade.       When Kennedy's decision to chose THAT national goal was made, the       development of the large LOX/Kerosene driven F-1 engine already had       reached a status well beyond of a feasability study and Kennedy's       advisors used the knowledge of existence of that powerful engine as a       feasibility proof, that this goal to reach the moon manned was       reachable.               During the same time the development of LOX/LH2 engines was in a       _very_ early stage - the RL-10 engine (used in Centaur and later in       Saturn-1, and in use until today in nearly all major US expendable       launchers as upper stage engine) just began to become reality, and the       J-2 engine used later in Saturn-1B and -V was in a much more embryonic       development phase then - without any guarantee, that another scaling       up to necessary thrust levels needed for first stage use was feasible       at all.               Today simply the goals have shifted. Even (or maybe especially) the       US rocket and engine developers know, that there is a necessity of       "clean" launchers in the future - maybe somewhen even the EPA could       forbid or strongly restrict the use of solid boosters. But who knows       for sure, what the future will bring?              cu, ZiLi aka HKZL (Heinrich Zinndorf-Linker)       --       "Abusus non tollit usum" - Latin: Abuse is no argument against proper use.              mailto: heinrich@zili.de http://zili.de              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca