Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,325 of 3,113    |
|    Len Lekx to All    |
|    Re: LH2/LOX in the first stage    |
|    07 Jan 05 13:57:10    |
      From: LFLekx@NOSPAM.rogers.com.retro.com              On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:16:59 GMT, henry@spsystems.net (Henry Spencer)       wrote:              >> You don't think it's more like the Atlas stage-and-a-half       >>system...? :-)       >To my mind, "stage and a half" is properly applied only to systems which       >(like the classical Atlas) have a staging event in which the departing       >hardware isn't a complete stage. (One can argue over whether it has to be               Point taken. I had considered the dropping-off of motors to be       half-staging... and SRBs (to me...) count as motors. :-)               With all the talk about LH2/LO2 versus non-cryogens, and given that       the Columbia crash was reportedly (I don't think we'll *ever* know for       sure...) caused by that chunk of insulation striking the wing of the       orbiter, I decided to see what would happen if I replaced the       cryogenic propellants with non-cryogens. No other changes to the       system yet, just the propellants...               I dug out an old copy of "The Space Shuttle Operators Manual" for       some extremely rough numbers, but:               If the current hydrogen tank is filled with hydrogen peroxide, the       liquid-oxygen tank has enough volume to be filled with the necessary       amount of JP-5 kerosene to burn it all. (Plus some extra...) The       GLOW of the vehicle becomes 3,900,000 kilograms, instead of the       2,000,000 kilos now. I have to work out detailed delta-V numbers, but       a cursory calculation suggests an increase of close to 3km/s over the       existing Shuttle system. Thrust and fuel-consumption numbers I still       have to work out, and I haven't figured in performance improvements       due to removing the weight of the insulation, but it looks promising.               (Bear in mind that this is a cursory analysis, done at 2AM this       morning...)               Which got me on another track - if a Shuttle were launched from       Churchill Falls, MB... where would the ET fall...? :-)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca