Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,353 of 3,113    |
|    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Vorbr=FCggen?= to All    |
|    Re: Inferno    |
|    14 Jan 05 14:01:32    |
      From: jvorbrueggen-not@mediasec.de              >>I was wondering about using titanium for just the leading structural       >>member. Comparing Al to Ti the melting points are 669C vs 1660C,       >>quite a bit different. I guess that says nothing of how much strength       >>either loses as they approach the melting point.       >       > Exactly. The maximum *working* temperatures -- temperatures at which they       > still dependably retain most of their strength -- are much, much lower,       > and if I recall correctly, only a couple of hundred degrees apart.              Additionally, this was a dynamic event. AIUI, Ti has lower thermal       conductivity, so in such a case the Al would have the advantage of       being able to "cool" the impacted parts of the structure to the rest       of it, while the local temperature rise would be faster for Ti, further       reducing its advantage.               Jan              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca