Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,377 of 3,113    |
|    John Halpenny to Terrell Miller    |
|    Re: Huygens shortlived?    |
|    17 Jan 05 17:12:29    |
      XPost: sci.space.policy, sci.astro       From: j.halpenny@rogers.com              Terrell Miller wrote:       >       > dexx wrote:       > > Is it true that Huygens ceased transmission less than 2 hours after       > > touchdown? Whilst it was a magnificent achievement to travel so far and       > > land perfectly, it seems a great shame that the probe was so short       > > lived. I'm suprised the designers didnt make it rugged enough and       > > powered enough to survive several days.       >       > one design limitation factor was the length of time that Cassini would       > be "over the horizon" wrt the lander. Huygens doesn't have powerful       > enough transmitters to relay the datastream directly to Earth, so having       > longer batt life wouldn't do anything but waste money and resources if       > it couldn't see its mothership and thus transmit data.       >       > Building enough transmitter power to send to Earth directly would very       > likely have major scalability issues, which in turn would have a direct       > impact on other mission profiles (maybe they could have had a powerful       > transmitter but little or no instrumentation to feed it data, f'rinstance).       >       > Mission planning for any tpye of space vehicle is a series of tradeoffs       > between various things: time, money, propellant, payload, *type* of       > payload, mission duration, mission capability, etc. etc.       >       > Bottom line: for any launcher and any vehicle and any mission profile,       > there's only so much you can include. Add more of thing X and you have       > to take away from things Y, Z and A'.       >       Perhaps more importantly, the more things you put in, the more effort to       integrate it all, the more effort needed to shave weight, and the more       potential for a mission-threatening screwup. How many missions have       failed, or even failed to get funded, because they were too ambitious?              --        John Halpenny                     A cluttered desk is the sign of a cluttered mind.       I’m so glad my desk isn't empty.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca