Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,379 of 3,113    |
|    John Schilling to kenw@kmsi.net    |
|    Re: Dual-mode SCRAM/conventional jet pos    |
|    17 Jan 05 15:03:46    |
      From: schillin@spock.usc.edu              kenw@kmsi.net writes:              >This is probably a dumb question, but...              >Would it be possible to use conventional jet engines to attain sufficient       >airspeed for scramjets to start to function?              Yes. Almost trivially so if your scramjet doesn't *need* to operate in       supersonic-combustion mode, but it should be possible to go straight from       afterburning turbojet to supersonic-combustion ramjet with the crossover       at Mach 3 or so.                     >SCRAMjets would seem to have limited value if they can only be launched       >via rocket.              Why? If the only purpose of the rocket is to accelerate the scramjet       to scramjet operating speeds, well, rockets are the absolute best choice       there is for accelerating quickly to hypersonic speeds. Turbojets can       do it, but A: barely and B: only by using heavy turbocompressor hardware       that you are then stuck hauling around while you do the scramjet thing.       Or, alternately, C: expensive turbocompressor hardware that you jettison       after using for one short burst of acceleration.              Conventional jet engines have only one single advantage over rockets,       that being their relative economy in propellant consumption. But that       only wins if you are going to be using them for an extended period of       time. If it's just a two-minute run up to Mach 3 and then turn off       the turbojet for the duration, it was a waste to bring the turbojet       in the first place.              Also, this being sci.space.tech, one has to think in terms of using the       scramjet as part of a space launch system. In which case, you're going       to need the rocket *anyway*, as scramjets can't get you more than half       way to orbit. If your scramjet space launch system absolutely has to       include a rocket good for boosting halfway to orbit, and it does, you       probably want to try real hard to use that same rocket to get up to       scramjet operating speed from the start, rather than adding a third       propulsion system to the mix.                     --       *John Schilling * "Anything worth doing, *       *Member:AIAA,NRA,ACLU,SAS,LP * is worth doing for money" *       *Chief Scientist & General Partner * -13th Rule of Acquisition *       *White Elephant Research, LLC * "There is no substitute *       *schillin@spock.usc.edu * for success" *       *661-718-0955 or 661-275-6795 * -58th Rule of Acquisition *              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca