Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,425 of 3,113    |
|    John Smith to James Nicoll    |
|    Re: Propellantless propulsion system    |
|    21 Jan 05 22:56:51    |
      From: user@example.net              James Nicoll wrote:       > Although the idea of being able to convert angular       > momentum into linear with actually throwing stuff is an old       > one in space: didn't both Tsiolkovsky _and_ Oberth briefly       > toy with that before seeing the obvious problem?              As a bit of whimsy - how about two long thin contra-rotating masses,       with an electric motor at the pivot point that makes them contra-rotate.       (Motor is powered by sun.) Two chopsticks spinning against each other.              One probe & one dummy mass are mounted on the tips of one of the       chopsticks. They can withstand some ridiculous amount of acceleration.              The contra-rotating chopsticks are spun up over some extended period of       time, until the tip velocity is some unimaginable figure that defies       modern materials science, and then the probe/mass are released. One       goes one way, one goes the other. The probe carries out useful science,       and the dummy mass causes a catastrophe somewhere two thousand years later.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca